I’m not ordinarily a big fan of animated films and I know almost next to nothing about the adventures of the titular character or the original comics on which they were based (apart from a short visit to the Tintin Museum/Shop in Brussels) — which is why it surprises me to declare that The Adventures of Tintin is one of the most exciting and enjoyable movies I’ve seen this year.
Facts about the film I probably should have been aware of before the opening credits:
- directed by Steven Spielberg;
- produced by Peter Jackson and Steven Spielberg;
- uses performance capture technology (made famous by The Lord of the Rings, King Kong and Rise of the Planet of the Apes) and features the performance capture king, Andy Serkis; and
- an all-star cast including Jamie Bell (Billy Elliot) as the protagonist Tintin, Serkis as the hilarious Captain Haddock, Daniel Craig as the sinister Sakharine, and Simon Pegg and Nick Frost (the duo from Shawn of the Dead, Paul) as Thomson and Thompson, the bumbling detectives.
This film, hopefully the first of a trilogy, is based on three of the original comic books, and tells the story of how young journalist (and essentially detective) Tintin and his beloved dog Snowy become embroiled in a wild adventure involving model ships, secret riddles, pirates and sunken treasures.
Thanks to Spielberg’s masterful storytelling and the amazing visual effects (made possible by the performance capture technology), The Adventures of Tintin is an engrossing, clever, humorous, exciting and wonderfully spectacular animated film. It is no coincidence that the film reminded me a lot of Spielberg’s Indiana Jones movies (especially the superior earlier ones), where the sense of adventure was genuine, fresh and thrilling. It is the type of film both children and adults can enjoy.
The look of the film is fantastic — everything but the human characters look real, and my guess is that they held back a little so that the human characters can closer resemble their comic counterparts and avoid looking ‘spooky’ (like say Polar Express or Beowulf). The combination of performance capture and ultra-realistic, high quality animation is spot on — it is impossible to imagine a traditionally animated film (or even a purely computer animated one) or a live action version of Tintin having the same atmosphere or effect. It looks real but not too real, allowing the film to utilise techniques and storytelling methods that work well in animated films but not live action ones.
The performances were fantastic. Rather than just providing voices, the subtleties of the actors’ body movements and expressions were also encapsulated in the characters they portrayed. It made a difference. Serkis’s Captain Haddock in particular was a standout, even if he might have come across as excessive at times. Daniel Craig was practically unrecognisable, and Simon Pegg and Nick Frost’s unmatched chemistry brought a certain harmony to Thomson and Thompson.
Although the 107-minute running time might have been 10-15 minutes over the ideal length of such a film, on the whole I was immensely impressed with The Adventures of Tintin. This is coming from someone who had never read a Tintin comic book and previously had no interest in ever reading one. Now I can’t wait for them to make the sequel, which will allegedly by directed by Peter Jackson (as soon as he is done with The Hobbit).
I don’t know if the film did justice to the original character or the comic books. But to me it doesn’t matter. A good film is a good film, and The Adventures of Tintin is just that.
4.5 out of 5 stars!
PS: I am continuing my stance of ‘no 3D’. I don’t think 3D would have necessarily ruined this film, but I don’t think it would have helped. 2D was perfectly fine, and it was good enough for me.