I’ll tell you a conversation I heard in the men’s room straight after the film between two young boys (that probably just hit puberty) that sums it up pretty well:
“Man, what an awesome movie!”
“Yeah! But what I didn’t get was why they had to [spoilers].”
“I didn’t get that either. And who was the robot that [spoilers] and the one that [spoilers] in the end?”
“I’m not sure. I think it was [spoilers] and [spoilers].”
“Really? I thought it was [spoilers].”
“Who cares? Megan Fox was hot though.”
“And the cars and robot fights were really cool.”
“Yeah, what an awesome movie!”
The second film (there will inevitably be more) of Michael Bay’s Transformers series is bigger, louder, longer and dumber than the original. So if you’ve seen the first, expect more of the same except with everything magnified. For some, like the teenage boys described above, that’s awesome. For most others, it’s downright unbearable.
As for me, I went into the film with sub-zero expectations because everything I’ve come across about the film shreds it to pieces. And while the film does fail miserably in most departments, it is not a complete waste of time and money. Some parts were exciting. Some were a little funny. So if you can put up with the rest of the parts that weren’t (and those were in the clear majority), then you might find it okay.
What’s it about?
There were 2 things in Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (let’s just call it Transformers II) that improved on the first film: (1) robot fight scenes; and (2) special effects.
One of my gripes about the original Transformers movie was that you couldn’t tell what was going on in a lot of the fight scenes between the Autobots and the Decepticons. All you could see were some quick flashes and giant balls of metal rolling around before one of them would stand victorious.
Transformers II rectifies the problem in a big way. The camera pans back this time and stays on the robots long enough for audiences to see and appreciate the action. So much so that kids can probably recreate the battles with their licensed Hasbro toys afterwards.
Seriously, the robot action was a lot smoother and more fluid this time.
Less noticeably, perhaps, were the special effects, which also improved from the original. Apart from the robots themselves, many of the fight scenes involved destroying well-known landmarks. This was done with amazing realism. Further, the robot transformations were even more intricate and visually impressive than last time.
Yep, there was a lot of bad.
For starters, the movie was way too long, clocking in at 2 hours and X minutes. I wouldn’t have had a problem had the film felt shorter, but it didn’t. It felt like a really long movie.
Secondly, the plot. It’s hard to know where to start with it so I won’t even try. I hadn’t expected it to be original but this was derivative to the point that you couldn’t simply ignore it. Let’s just say they could have put a little more effort into disguising it better.
Even the jokes were bad this time. There were some decent laughs too, but many of jokes in Transformers II fell flat. Like bad ‘Scary Movie’ jokes flat. Especially when it tried to be ‘cool’, it turned out to be lame. The twin Autobots were the prime culprits.
The film took a turn for the better when John Turturro arrived. Like the first film, he was the comic highlight, but although he had some good lines he had limited screen time and dare I say even some of his antics wore a little thin at times.
Transformers II has some of the worst editing of any film I have seen in recent times. It’s not bad to the extent that you don’t know what’s going on, but it provides plenty of ‘WTFs?’. For a major blockbuster like this, there’s no excuse. To me, it reeks of laziness. It’s as though the makers only cared about the cars, the action and the girls, and forgot about everything else.
Case in point – you know how when lead actor Shia LaBeouf injured his hand in a motor accident in real life and Bay said that they would work that into the movie? Not really. They just kind of fudged it – the idea wasn’t awful, but the execution was. If you’ve seen the film you’ll know what I mean.
The majority of the main cast from the original returned. Shia LaBeouf is getting over exposed these days, so he may be losing his charm, but he still does a reasonable job as the hero. There were a few scenes where he demonstrates that his head hasn’t gotten so big that he’s unwilling to be ridiculed.
Megan Fox returns to play another sexy role as his girlfriend and doesn’t do much other than trying to look and sound appealing. She’s actually not bad, but for some reason really looks like she could use a nice long bath.
The key new addition is the new roommate, Leo Spitz, played by Ramon Rodriguez, who is the primary comic relief until John Turturro returns. Both men provide a spark to an often sagging film, though their jokes can be uneven.
On the military side, Josh Duhamel and Tyrese Gibson return to their rather useless roles. If they wanted to trim the fat off this movie then these guys should have gone first.
Michael Bay didn’t try to cater for all audiences like say JJ Abrams did with Star Trek – it’s very clear from the first few minutes that Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen is nothing more than a bit of brainless fun targeted at overly excited teenagers. However, even if you accept the film for what it is, it doesn’t necessarily succeed. It’s still far too long and disjointed, and everything other than the special effects and action sequences feel extraordinarily lazy, as though they didn’t think anyone would notice or care if they put no effort into it. That said, if you can put all of that aside…
2.5 stars out of 5!